Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock due to lupus myocarditis: a case report
Case Report

Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock due to lupus myocarditis: a case report

Ryosuke Omoto1 ORCID logo, Yumika Yonao1, Takaya Nishiura1, Sung Ho Kim1, Tomoki Yamada1, Yoshihiko Ikeda2, Yasuaki Mizushima1

1Emergency and Critical Care Medical Center, Osaka Keisatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan; 2Department of Pathology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: R Omoto, Y Yonao, T Nishiura, SH Kim, T Yamada, Y Mizushima; (II) Administrative support: R Omoto, Y Yonao, T Nishiura, SH Kim, T Yamada, Y Mizushima; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: R Omoto, Y Yonao, T Nishiura, SH Kim, T Yamada, Y Mizushima; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: R Omoto, Y Yonao, T Nishiura, SH Kim, T Yamada, Y Mizushima; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: R Omoto, Y Ikeda; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Ryosuke Omoto, MD. Emergency and Critical Care Medical Center, Osaka Keisatsu Hospital, 2-6-40, Karasugatsuji, Tennoji-ku, Osaka city, Osaka 543-8922, Japan. Email: ryo.ohmoto91@gmail.com.

Background: Myocarditis due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), also known as lupus myocarditis, is a rare but potentially life-threatening manifestation of this autoimmune disease. Although pericardial involvement is more commonly observed in SLE, myocarditis can occasionally lead to severe cardiac dysfunction and cardiogenic shock. Diagnosis can be challenging due to non-specific symptoms, and early recognition is crucial. Reports of cases requiring advanced circulatory support, such as venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), remain extremely limited in the literature.

Case Description: We report the case of a 47-year-old woman with a known history of SLE who experienced sudden cardiac arrest at Osaka Keisatsu Hospital. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was immediately initiated, and return of spontaneous circulation was achieved. Despite this, she remained in prolonged cardiogenic shock unresponsive to conventional therapy, prompting the initiation of VA-ECMO on the day of admission. Laboratory and imaging findings supported the diagnosis of lupus myocarditis and high-dose corticosteroid therapy was commenced promptly. Over the following days, her cardiac function gradually improved, and she was weaned off VA-ECMO on day 6. Remarkably, she demonstrated a full neurological recovery and was eventually discharged without significant sequelae.

Conclusions: This case highlights the severe cardiac complications that can arise in patients with SLE, particularly the rare occurrence of myocarditis leading to cardiogenic shock. The timely use of VA-ECMO provided essential hemodynamic support, allowing for patient stabilization and further management. Early diagnosis, aggressive management, and multidisciplinary care are critical to achieving favorable outcomes in such complex cases.

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); myocarditis; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); case report


Received: 15 March 2025; Accepted: 03 June 2025; Published online: 26 September 2025.

doi: 10.21037/acr-2025-83


Highlight box

Key finding

• We reported a rare case of lupus myocarditis that causing cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock, successfully treated with venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and corticosteroids.

What is known and what is new?

• Lupus myocarditis is a rare but potentially fatal complication of systemic lupus erythematosus, affecting approximately 3–9% of patients. The use of VA-ECMO in such cases is rarely reported.

• This report demonstrates the successful use of VA-ECMO to manage severe lupus myocarditis, resulting in full cardiac and neurological recovery.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• Prompt initiation of advanced cardiovascular support like VA-ECMO are critical for improving survival and long-term outcomes in severe cases. Multidisciplinary approaches should be prioritized in managing these patients.


Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by multiorgan involvement and various clinical manifestations (1). SLE occurs primarily in women of childbearing age and presents with a variety of clinical manifestations, including cutaneous, renal, hematologic, and cardiovascular symptoms (1). Pericarditis is the most common cardiovascular complication in SLE (2). Lupus myocarditis is relatively rare but potentially life-threatening complication that can lead to fatal arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock that is reported in 3–9% of patients with SLE (3). There are very few reports of venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) being introduced in cases of cardiogenic shock or fatal arrhythmia caused by lupus myocarditis (3-8).

We report a case of cardiac arrest due to SLE-induced myocarditis, which was successfully resuscitated; however, prolonged cardiogenic shock resulted in the introduction of VA-ECMO. We present this article in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist (available at https://acr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/acr-2025-83/rc).


Case presentation

A 47-year-old female presented with abdominal pain and was referred to our emergency department. Her medical history included SLE managed with prednisolone (7.5 mg). In the ambulance, she experienced cardiac arrest (asystole) but was successfully resuscitated with 1 min of chest compressions. On arrival at the hospital, her Glasgow Coma Scale score was E1V1M5 with her pupils dilated to 5 mm bilaterally. Her vital signs were as follows: blood pressure, 188/122 mmHg; heart rate, 140 beats per minute; blood oxygen saturation, 92% (O2: 15 L/min); and body temperature, 36.1 ℃. An initial blood gas analysis showed severe acidosis (pH: 6.52), hypercapnia (CO2: 116.6 mmHg), hypoxemia (O2: 27.9 mmHg), with base excess, −31.6; bicarbonate, 9.3 mmol/L; and lactate, 165.4 mg/dL. The cause of initial cardiac arrest and elevated lactate levels were thought to be severely reduced cardiac output, we could not identify the cause of marked hypercapnia.

After intubation and initial management, due to protracted metabolic acidosis, the patient experienced pulseless electrical activity 12 min after hospital arrival and was resuscitated within 4 minutes with adrenaline. As the cause of the cardiac arrest was unclear cardiogenic shock, we performed coronary angiography (CAG) with no obvious stenosis. After CAG, the patient exhibited persistent cardiogenic shock, with a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 15%. Although blood pressure was maintained without vasopressors, the prolonged severe metabolic acidosis with pH: 7.03 and markedly elevated lactate levels of 193 mg/dL; thus, we judged the patient was hemodynamically unstable, and VA-ECMO was introduced for cardiogenic shock 76 min after arrival. Following a CT scan, which revealed only minor aspiration pneumonia, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

After admission to the ICU, steroid therapy (prednisolone 40 mg + hydrocortisone 100 mg) was promptly started base on the patient’s known diagnosis of SLE, chronic steroid use, and the absence of other identifiable causes on initial investigations, which made lupus myocarditis the most likely diagnosis. The cardiac function gradually improved, and echocardiography showed an LVEF of 20% on day 3 and 40% on day 6. Although this recovery may have been partly due to post-resuscitation myocardial stunning and correction of acidosis, it is more likely that lupus myocarditis responded to steroid therapy, given the clinical context and exclusion of infection or coronary artery disease. After performing a myocardial biopsy on day 6, the patient was successfully weaned off VA-ECMO. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) revealed moderate endocardial thickening and interstitial fibrosis with slight infiltration of CD3-positive T-lymphocytes and CD68-positive macrophages in the interstitial tissues. No evidence of microthrombi or diffuse human leukocyte antigen-DR isotype positivity in the vascular endothelial cells was observed. (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Myocardial biopsy specimens indicating myocyte damage and inflammatory cell infiltration. (A) HE staining at ×400 magnification shows mononuclear cell infiltration into the stroma, possibly lymphocytes. (B) Immunohistochemical staining at ×400 magnification shows a slight infiltration of CD3-positive T lymphocytes in the interstitial tissues. (C) Immunohistochemical staining at ×200 magnification shows CD68-positive macrophages infiltrating the interstitial tissues. (D) Tenascin C (TC/4F10) staining at ×100 magnification is partially positive in the endocardium and interstitial tissues, indicating tissue remodeling. HE, hematoxylin and eosin.

She was extubated on day 8 and discharged from the ICU on day 13 with an LVEF of 53%. On day 48, the LVEF improved to 58%, and the patient was transferred for rehabilitation with prednisolone (10 mg). The trends in LVEF, steroid administration, and time flow after admission are shown in a time-course chart (Figure 2). A good neurological outcome was achieved with a cerebral performance category score of 1.

Figure 2 The trend in the LVEF and the steroid dose (equivalent to prednisolone). LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration and its subsequent amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.


Discussion

SLE is a systemic autoimmune disease that predominantly affects women of childbearing age. It is characterized by multi-organ involvement, including the skin, kidneys, hematologic systems, and cardiovascular system (1). SLE can present with multiple cardiovascular complications, with pericarditis being the most common. Lupus myocarditis, which occurs in approximately 9% of patients with SLE, remains rare but life-threatening (3). The condition often progresses to arrhythmia, heart failure, and cardiogenic shock, requiring urgent intervention. Notably, myocarditis was the first manifestation of SLE in 59% of the cases in a multicenter study, indicating the importance of early suspicion and a prompt diagnosis in patients with SLE presenting with cardiac symptoms (8).

Thomas et al. reported that of 29 cases of lupus myocarditis, 81% achieved full cardiac recovery with an LVEF ≥55% during a median follow-up period of 37 months (8). To the best of our knowledge, there have only been 5 case reports and one case series of VA-ECMO for acute myocarditis due to SLE (3-8). Table 1 summarizes the clinical course of the 9 cases, including our case. One patient underwent a heart transplant and one died, but in the remaining 7 patients, the cardiac function recovered and they were successfully weaned off ECMO within a relatively short period of time. Therefore, although lupus myocarditis often takes a serious course in the acute phase, most survivors experience a good long-term prognosis with appropriate treatment.

Table 1

The cases of VA-ECMO for acute myocarditis due to SLE

Published year Author Age (years) Sex Cause VA-ECMO duration (days) Treatment Initial EF (%) EF at discharge (%) Outcome
2009 Cooper LT Jr (9) 29 F Cardiac shock Unknown mPSL, CYC, (IVIG, plasma exchange) Unknown 50 Good recovery
25 F Cardiac shock Death in ICU
40 M Cardiac shock Unknown 50 Good recovery (but died after 4 years)
2013 Huang C et al. (4) 12 F VF/VT 3 PSL, mPSL, MTX, HCQ, AZA 43 55 Good recovery
2018 Tariq S et al. (5) 41 M Cardiac shock Unknown Steroid, IVIG, RIT 15 Low Heart transplant
2020 Smith C et al. (6) 25 F Cardiac shock→PEA 10 mPSL, IVIG, CYC, plasmapheresis 10 44 Good recovery
2020 Liu L et al. (7) 47 F Cardiac shock 7 mPSL, CYC 25 74 Good recovery
2021 Lee S et al. (3) 62 F Cardiac shock 9 mPSL, HCQ, AZA Low Normal Good recovery
2024 Our case 47 F PEA/cardiac shock 6 mPSL, PSL 15 58 Good recovery

AZA, azathioprine; CYC, cyclophosphamide; EF, ejection fraction; F, female; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; ICU, intensive care unit; IVIG, intravenous immunogloblin; M, male; mPSL, methylprednisolone; MTX, methotrexate; PEA, pulseless electrical activity; PSL, predonisolone; RIT, rituximab; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; VA-ECMO, venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia.

Although echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often used in the diagnostic process, an EMB remains the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis (9). However, EMBs are rarely performed because of their invasive nature and limited diagnostic yield, as most samples are taken from the right ventricle, whereas lupus myocarditis predominantly affects the left ventricle, which reduces sensitivity (10). In a series of cardiac biopsies of patients suspected of having SLE myocarditis, nonspecific interstitial fibrosis and myocyte hypertrophy were the most common findings. Evidence of inflammatory myocardial infiltration was found in only 27% of cases, and these were considered non-specific for myocarditis. Similarly, in our case, biopsy findings were non-specific; however, based on the clinical course, a diagnosis of lupus myocarditis was made. These findings suggest that myocardial biopsy has limited value in the diagnosis of SLE myocarditis and that it is more useful for ruling out other diagnoses.

To address these limitations, non-invasive imaging modalities such as cardiac MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) have emerged as valuable diagnostic tools. Cardiac MRI provides detailed structural and functional insights, including the presence of myocardial edema, inflammation, and fibrosis, through techniques such as T2-weighted imaging and late gadolinium enhancement. These features are highly sensitive for myocarditis and can help confirm the diagnosis in cases where EMB results are inconclusive (11). Furthermore, MRI allows for repeated evaluations to monitor treatment response without procedural risks, making it an essential tool in managing lupus myocarditis. FDG-PET, on the other hand, detects active myocardial inflammation by identifying areas of increased glucose uptake by inflammatory cells. This imaging modality is particularly useful for differentiating lupus myocarditis from other causes of cardiogenic shock, such as ischemic heart disease, and for assessing the extent of inflammation in systemic autoimmune conditions (10). By integrating findings from MRI and FDG-PET with clinical and laboratory data, clinicians can achieve a more comprehensive and accurate diagnosis while avoiding the risks associated with invasive procedures.

This case represents a valuable example of achieving full cardiac recovery in a patient with severe myocarditis due to SLE that progressed to acute cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Prompt initiation of VA-ECMO and steroid therapy played a critical role in the successful outcome. It highlights the importance of early intervention and a multidisciplinary approach in managing severe cardiac complications associated with SLE. This case contributes to the limited pool of reported instances of lupus myocarditis treated with VA-ECMO. Sharing such detailed clinical experiences is vital for expanding the collective understanding of rare but severe manifestations of SLE and refining future treatment guidelines.


Conclusions

This was a rare case of myocarditis due to SLE that progressed to cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest, requiring VA-ECMO support. Although the patient was initially unstable, with timely steroid treatment and VA-ECMO support, her cardiac function completely recovered, and she had a good neurological outcome. This case emphasizes the importance of prompt intervention for severe cardiac symptoms in SLE patients.


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the CARE reporting checklist. Available at https://acr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/acr-2025-83/rc

Peer Review File: Available at https://acr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/acr-2025-83/prf

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://acr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/acr-2025-83/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration and its subsequent amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Ameer MA, Chaudhry H, Mushtaq J, et al. An Overview of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Pathogenesis, Classification, and Management. Cureus 2022;14:e30330. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Nor MA, Ogedegbe OJ, Barbarawi A, et al. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023;15:e39284. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Lee SY, Park JH, Shin DH, et al. Fatal Myopericarditis in a Patient With Lupus Erythematosus Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Case Report. J Rheum Dis 2021;28:165-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Huang CN, Yu HH, Chiu SN, et al. Acute myocarditis and ventricular fibrillation as initial presentation of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 2013;33:1093-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Tariq S, Garg A, Gass A, et al. Myocarditis due to systemic lupus erythematosus associated with cardiogenic shock. Arch Med Sci 2018;14:460-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Smith C, Guglin M, Dougherty RE, et al. A Unique Case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Myocarditis Complicated by Plasmapheresis-Responsive Cardiogenic Shock. JACC Case Rep 2020;2:2376-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Liu L, Dong Y, Gao H, et al. Cardiogenic shock as the initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. ESC Heart Fail 2020;7:1992-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Thomas G, Cohen Aubart F, Chiche L, et al. Lupus Myocarditis: Initial Presentation and Longterm Outcomes in a Multicentric Series of 29 Patients. J Rheumatol 2017;44:24-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Cooper LT Jr. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1526-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Perel-Winkler A, Bokhari S, Perez-Recio T, et al. Myocarditis in systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosed by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Lupus Sci Med 2018;5:e000265. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Mavrogeni S, Markousis-Mavrogenis G, Koutsogeorgopoulou L, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in autoimmune myocarditis. Autoimmun Rev 2017;16:856-64.
doi: 10.21037/acr-2025-83
Cite this article as: Omoto R, Yonao Y, Nishiura T, Kim SH, Yamada T, Ikeda Y, Mizushima Y. Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock due to lupus myocarditis: a case report. AME Case Rep 2025;9:134.

Download Citation